Skip to content

ASM International N.V. vs Tokyo Electron: AI supply-chain exposure compared

The verdict

Tokyo Electron carries the heavier AI-chain exposure (ASM International N.V. 57/100 vs Tokyo Electron 67/100). They share 6 parts of the chain — including Foundry capacity, Yield, GPU. Each owns 2 binding nodes.

Based on 6 mapped exposures for ASM International N.V. and 7 for Tokyo Electron.

ASM International N.V. logoASM International N.V.ASM.AS · Chips
Chain weight
57/100
Parts exposed
6
Layers spanned
1
Bottlenecks owned
2
Tokyo Electron logoTokyo Electron8035.T · Chips
Chain weight
67/100
Parts exposed
7
Layers spanned
1
Bottlenecks owned
2

Only Tokyo Electron

Frequently asked

Is ASM International N.V. or Tokyo Electron more exposed to the AI supply chain?

Tokyo Electron, on the model's chain-weight (ASM International N.V. 57/100 vs Tokyo Electron 67/100).

What do ASM International N.V. and Tokyo Electron have in common in the AI chain?

Both are exposed to Foundry capacity, Yield, GPU, HBM, ASIC, CoWoS / advanced packaging.

How is this ASM International N.V. vs Tokyo Electron comparison made?

From THE ENTITY's model of the AI value chain — each company's exposures to the parts of the chain, weighted by how central those parts are and its role. Structural, not a price target.

A structural comparison from our model of the AI value chain — illustrative, not investment advice.

as of 2026-07-17Medium confidence model v0.7.0