Skip to content

NTT Global Data Centers vs Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group: AI supply-chain exposure compared

The verdict

The model doesn't map enough of NTT Global Data Centers's chain position to call a leader — NTT Global Data Centers has 2 mapped exposures (a leader call needs 3+ on both sides). They share 2 parts of the chain — including AI factory, Data-center construction. Each owns 0 binding nodes.

Based on 2 mapped exposures for NTT Global Data Centers and 3 for Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group.

NGNTT Global Data CentersPrivate · Infrastructure
Chain weight
35/100
Parts exposed
2
Layers spanned
1
Bottlenecks owned
0
300442.SZRange Intelligent Computing Technology Group300442.SZ · Infrastructure
Chain weight
30/100
Parts exposed
3
Layers spanned
1
Bottlenecks owned
0

Only Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group

Frequently asked

Is NTT Global Data Centers or Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group more exposed to the AI supply chain?

The model's coverage is too thin to say — Based on 2 mapped exposures for NTT Global Data Centers and 3 for Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group.

What do NTT Global Data Centers and Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group have in common in the AI chain?

Both are exposed to AI factory, Data-center construction.

How is this NTT Global Data Centers vs Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group comparison made?

From THE ENTITY's model of the AI value chain — each company's exposures to the parts of the chain, weighted by how central those parts are and its role. Structural, not a price target.

A structural comparison from our model of the AI value chain — illustrative, not investment advice.

as of 2026-07-17Medium confidence model v0.7.0